For over two decades, ITI has helped hundreds of clients implement
simulation-driven processes.
-
Using SE/ALD, an aircraft engine manufacturer evaluated more than 1,000 concept
alternatives using simulation-driven design and got to market a full year
before their closest competitor.
-
An agricultural tractor manufacturer developed a new product in half the time
of conventional methods at 30% cost reduction, with the tractor setting
best-in-class performance standards in noise reduction and turning radius.
-
On its initial simulation-driven development program, a power tool manufacturer
produced a cordless driver that increases market share 63%. The methodology was
applied to other tool programs with similar results and is today being
implemented throughout the company.
Similar results are being documented by those who manufacturer everything from
automobiles and printers to home appliances, lawn and garden equipment, office
furniture, hard disk drives and more.
Building multiple physical prototypes is rarely practical or cost effective.
Conversely, validated virtual models representing a number of design
alternatives can be modified, analyzed and evaluated to lead design decisions
at a fraction of the time and cost. An important measure in simulation-driven
development is the number and cost of design changes, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Engineering Changes & Associated Costs
With the traditional design-analyze-build-test approach the cost of design
change and the amount of money spent in the series of prototypes are enormous.
To lower design change costs and the shape of the curve somewhat, many
companies today use digital engineering, where CAD models replace engineering
paper drawings and some level of computer analysis is performed after designs
are created. The greatest impact is made with SE/ALD simulation-driven
development in radically lowering the number of design changes later in
development by concentrating engineering efforts upfront in the process. Thus,
companies must focus more resources earlier in the process, with as much as
two-thirds of their engineering budget spent before detailed design begins.

Figure 2: Return on Investment for Upfront Engineering
As shown in Figure 2, this increase in upfront simulation can result in
significant added return on investment (ROI) and improvements in breakeven
production volumes. But a paradigm shift in top management thinking is critical
in providing sufficient funding early enough in the program.
Read More:
Learn More:
All contents copyright© 2008 International TechneGroup Incorporated. All Rights Reserved.